Carole Lloyd

Carole Lloyd

I'm a highly experienced crypto author. I've been writing about cryptocurrency for over 3 years now and have seen the industry grow and change immensely. I have a deep understanding of the technology behind crypto and can explain complex concepts in simple terms. My blog is followed by thousands of people who are interested in learning more about cryptocurrency.

Cardano's Smart Contracts Face Major Scalability Issue

Cardano’s Smart Contracts Face Major Scalability Issue

Key Takeaways Cardano’s EUTXO-based protocol design has proven challenging for decentralized application developers. Minswap, the first decentralized exchange to launch on Cardano testnet, faced immediate scaling issues last week. While several projects claim to have solved the concurrency issue, none have publicly revealed their solutions. Share this article Cardano, the third-largest cryptocurrency with a market cap of over $82.8 billion, has become the subject of criticism as its ecosystem infrastructure does not allow for the most basic decentralized applications to function without facing immediate scaling issues. Cardano dApp Developers Face Concurrency Issues Cardano is facing a major scalability hurdle. Input Output, the development company behind Cardano, announced the launch of the Plutus smart contract functionality on testnet last Thursday. Since the update went live, Minswap, the first decentralized exchange to launch on testnet, has run into severe scaling issues, raising concerns about Cardano’s capability to run smart contracts.  It’s unfortunate that we have to shut down our testnet temporarily. We have gathered enough data from our testers to improve the fundamental of our DEX. In the next few days, we’ll publish our post-mortem, our scaling solution and when the testnet will be open up again. — Minswap | FISO live! 🚀 (@MinswapDEX) September 5, 2021 Users testing Minswap were surprised to find that the dApp could only handle one transaction per block. “Looks good,” one Reddit user wrote. “But when I try to swap things, all I’m getting is ‘Transaction fail: UTxOs are being used this block. Please wait 20-40 seconds and try again.” “After we launched, some users took screenshots related to locked UTXOs on Twitter, and the rest is history,” Minswap founder and engineering lead Long Nguyen told Crypto Briefing. He added that Minswap built their protocol on Cardano because “it’s the most decentralized Proof-of-Stake chain, with more than 3,000 nodes being run by the community, and 66% being run by single node operators.” Be that as it may, it would appear that building scalable, fully on-chain decentralized applications on the blockchain has become a bigger challenge than many in the community had anticipated. Specifically, unlike Ethereum, Solana, and most other smart contract enabled-blockchains, which employ an account-based model to compute transactions, Cardano employs a novel iteration of Bitcoin’s UTXO model called Extended UTXO (EUTXO). The EUTXO model poses challenges for Cardano dApp builders because of a so-called concurrency “issue.” In simple terms, concurrency refers to the ability for multiple different agents to interact with the same smart contract at the same time.  Account-based models allow multiple users to interact with the same smart contracts by default. However, EUTXO-based smart contract blockchains pose difficulties for developers to mitigate concurrency without making compromises on security or decentralization.  Solutions for concurrency include building dApps that tolerate segmentations of state or aggregating multiple interactions to settle on the same state. For decentralized exchanges, this would mean either fragmenting liquidity into multiple pools (states) or using third-party sequencers to batch multiple transactions and settle them as one transaction in the same state. The former gravely damages capital efficiency, while the latter could potentially prove to be a viable solution. Maladex is a Cardano-based decentralized exchange that claims to have solved concurrency. Discussing the potential downsides of using sequencers to mitigate concurrency, Jarek, the project’s CEO and lead developer, told Crypto Briefing:  “Other than, depending on the way it’s implemented, degree of centralization bottleneck, [there are] none. Off-chain is a natural part of the ecosystem and just prepares transactions for the blockchain where then they’re validated and executed.” “There is this uncomfortable part that it might increase centralization,” he added. “But it isn’t any different than the centralization we’ve got with UI for each protocol.”  Jarek further argues that using dApp-layer sequencers can mitigate front-running and MEV attacks because they aggregate multiple transactions to be executed at once.  However, Chief Investment Officer at Arcane Assets and vocal Cardano critic Eric Wall argues that MEV would still be possible if the blockchain used a sequencer. Explaining how MEV could occur on Cardano, he told Crypto Briefing: “First of all, the sequencer can extract MEV by choosing to include one transaction (his own) but censor another. Secondly, the miner/validator on the Cardano base layer can look at a sequencer’s batch of transactions and reject parts of it or the whole batch if he’d rather make some of those transactions himself when he’s putting the block together.” Other proposed solutions for scaling dApps on Cardano involve implementing Layer 2 protocols and sidechains, which deal with their own unique centralization and security challenges (while such solutions are yet to go live on Cardano, at least one EVM-compatible sidechain is in the pipeline).  Already partners such as @MutualKnowledge are developing solutions like their AVOUM, which can lay an account-based model atop a UTXO-type chain for developers who prefer that way of working. Protocol upgrades like the work being done on #Hydra will add further capability. 17/n — Input Output (@InputOutputHK) September 5, 2021 The big question is whether Cardano—given its EUTXO-based design choice—can support scalable and capital-efficient decentralized exchanges built fully on-chain. While Maladex claims concurrency is “complete and utter FUD,” Eric Wall argues that it’s unlikely Cardano dApps will solve concurrency without making significant security or centralization sacrifices. He told Crypto Briefing that while dApp developers could find workarounds, they may involve “significant development challenges, UX challenges, or centralization.”  The Cardano community has hailed Alonzo as a major new step for the blockchain’s DeFi capabilities. However, the testnet results suggest that it could be at least a few more years until it lives up to its promise. Once the upgrade ships, there won’t be an explosion of DeFi protocols. Instead, Nguyen thinks it will look like Ethereum did in 2018. “The good and best dApps will slowly appear over the years to come,” he said. Share this article The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or…

Read More
Cardano's Smart Contracts Face Major Scalability Issue

Cardano’s Smart Contracts Face Major Scalability Issue

Key Takeaways Cardano’s EUTXO-based protocol design has proven challenging for decentralized application developers. Minswap, the first decentralized exchange to launch on Cardano testnet, faced immediate scaling issues last week. While several projects claim to have solved the concurrency issue, none have publicly revealed their solutions. Share this article Cardano, the third-largest cryptocurrency with a market cap of over $82.8 billion, has become the subject of criticism as its ecosystem infrastructure does not allow for the most basic decentralized applications to function without facing immediate scaling issues. Cardano dApp Developers Face Concurrency Issues Cardano is facing a major scalability hurdle. Input Output, the development company behind Cardano, announced the launch of the Plutus smart contract functionality on testnet last Thursday. Since the update went live, Minswap, the first decentralized exchange to launch on testnet, has run into severe scaling issues, raising concerns about Cardano’s capability to run smart contracts.  It’s unfortunate that we have to shut down our testnet temporarily. We have gathered enough data from our testers to improve the fundamental of our DEX. In the next few days, we’ll publish our post-mortem, our scaling solution and when the testnet will be open up again. — Minswap | FISO live! 🚀 (@MinswapDEX) September 5, 2021 Users testing Minswap were surprised to find that the dApp could only handle one transaction per block. “Looks good,” one Reddit user wrote. “But when I try to swap things, all I’m getting is ‘Transaction fail: UTxOs are being used this block. Please wait 20-40 seconds and try again.” “After we launched, some users took screenshots related to locked UTXOs on Twitter, and the rest is history,” Minswap founder and engineering lead Long Nguyen told Crypto Briefing. He added that Minswap built their protocol on Cardano because “it’s the most decentralized Proof-of-Stake chain, with more than 3,000 nodes being run by the community, and 66% being run by single node operators.” Be that as it may, it would appear that building scalable, fully on-chain decentralized applications on the blockchain has become a bigger challenge than many in the community had anticipated. Specifically, unlike Ethereum, Solana, and most other smart contract enabled-blockchains, which employ an account-based model to compute transactions, Cardano employs a novel iteration of Bitcoin’s UTXO model called Extended UTXO (EUTXO). The EUTXO model poses challenges for Cardano dApp builders because of a so-called concurrency “issue.” In simple terms, concurrency refers to the ability for multiple different agents to interact with the same smart contract at the same time.  Account-based models allow multiple users to interact with the same smart contracts by default. However, EUTXO-based smart contract blockchains pose difficulties for developers to mitigate concurrency without making compromises on security or decentralization.  Solutions for concurrency include building dApps that tolerate segmentations of state or aggregating multiple interactions to settle on the same state. For decentralized exchanges, this would mean either fragmenting liquidity into multiple pools (states) or using third-party sequencers to batch multiple transactions and settle them as one transaction in the same state. The former gravely damages capital efficiency, while the latter could potentially prove to be a viable solution. Maladex is a Cardano-based decentralized exchange that claims to have solved concurrency. Discussing the potential downsides of using sequencers to mitigate concurrency, Jarek, the project’s CEO and lead developer, told Crypto Briefing:  “Other than, depending on the way it’s implemented, degree of centralization bottleneck, [there are] none. Off-chain is a natural part of the ecosystem and just prepares transactions for the blockchain where then they’re validated and executed.” “There is this uncomfortable part that it might increase centralization,” he added. “But it isn’t any different than the centralization we’ve got with UI for each protocol.”  Jarek further argues that using dApp-layer sequencers can mitigate front-running and MEV attacks because they aggregate multiple transactions to be executed at once.  However, Chief Investment Officer at Arcane Assets and vocal Cardano critic Eric Wall argues that MEV would still be possible if the blockchain used a sequencer. Explaining how MEV could occur on Cardano, he told Crypto Briefing: “First of all, the sequencer can extract MEV by choosing to include one transaction (his own) but censor another. Secondly, the miner/validator on the Cardano base layer can look at a sequencer’s batch of transactions and reject parts of it or the whole batch if he’d rather make some of those transactions himself when he’s putting the block together.” Other proposed solutions for scaling dApps on Cardano involve implementing Layer 2 protocols and sidechains, which deal with their own unique centralization and security challenges (while such solutions are yet to go live on Cardano, at least one EVM-compatible sidechain is in the pipeline).  Already partners such as @MutualKnowledge are developing solutions like their AVOUM, which can lay an account-based model atop a UTXO-type chain for developers who prefer that way of working. Protocol upgrades like the work being done on #Hydra will add further capability. 17/n — Input Output (@InputOutputHK) September 5, 2021 The big question is whether Cardano—given its EUTXO-based design choice—can support scalable and capital-efficient decentralized exchanges built fully on-chain. While Maladex claims concurrency is “complete and utter FUD,” Eric Wall argues that it’s unlikely Cardano dApps will solve concurrency without making significant security or centralization sacrifices. He told Crypto Briefing that while dApp developers could find workarounds, they may involve “significant development challenges, UX challenges, or centralization.”  The Cardano community has hailed Alonzo as a major new step for the blockchain’s DeFi capabilities. However, the testnet results suggest that it could be at least a few more years until it lives up to its promise. Once the upgrade ships, there won’t be an explosion of DeFi protocols. Instead, Nguyen thinks it will look like Ethereum did in 2018. “The good and best dApps will slowly appear over the years to come,” he said. Share this article The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or…

Read More
LINK price locks in 36% gains following Ethereum layer 2's Chainlink integration

LINK price locks in 36% gains following Ethereum layer 2’s Chainlink integration

Chainlink emerged as one of the best cryptocurrency performers on Sept. 6 as the price of its LINK token jumped 8.25% against the U.S. dollar.The LINK/USD exchange rate reached $36.35 for the first time since May 20, months after bottoming out near $13.45 — thus recovering by more than 170% altogether. At the same time, its recent bout of buying saw prices bringing in about 36% month-to-date returns.Ecosystem growthOptimism Ethereum announced on Sept. 1 that it had integrated Chainlink’s market-leading decentralized oracle solutions to its Ethereum layer-two services. As a result, LINK — which serves as a payment and staking token inside the Chainlink ecosystem — rose by 36% on the prospects of seeing higher interim demand from Chainlink users.The same fundamentals previously assisted LINK investors in closing 2020 at a 540% profit.A booming decentralized finance (DeFi) space and its dependency on Chainlink to secure live data feeds pushed demand for LINK higher among users and speculators alike. As a result, Chainlink’s market share in the DeFi reached 80% at one point in time, reported ZDNet.How Chainlink works. Source: ChainlinkLINK continued its climb in the first quarter of 2021, surging 161%, but followed the upside boom with a disappointing second quarter after falling 37%. Its losses came in the wake of an overall correction trend across top cryptocurrency tokens, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH).Yuriy Mazur, head of data analytics at crypto exchange CEX.IO, said LINK could climb above $50 in the coming three weeks. The analyst cited Chainlink’s partnership with over 76 new projects in August as one of the primary bullish indicators for its native token. He told Cointelegraph:”This relevance has perhaps boosted LINK accumulation to access the Chainlink offerings. As a result, spot traders appear ambitious to stir the price growth until LINK/USD retests the previous all-time high of $52.”But for Stephen Tuttle, a financial analyst at Seeking Alpha, the next big upside target for Chainlink’s token sits near $65.Tuttle noted that traders have allocated all their attention to Ether due to its principal involvement in the booming nonfungible token (NFT) space. As a result, he anticipated a capital reallocation after the ETH price rally tops out, which would be extremely beneficial to the LINK market.”If Chainlink can once again reach 0.02 Eth per Link, at Ethereum’s current price, this would place the Link token at about $65, or a 2.6x increase from its current price of $25.”At the time of writing, the LINK/ETH rate was 0.009 ETH.Broadening wedge alert!LINK’s latest price rally also surfaced in the wake of an overall crypto boom, with Bitcoin retaking $51,000 and Ether rising toward $4,000. Crypto traders raised their bids across the board, anticipating that the Federal Reserve would delay its taper plans after two disappointing U.S. jobs reports last week.Related: Chainlink (LINK) looks for momentum while pro traders target $40As a result, LINK’s market bias remains highly correlated to top coins. Atop that, there are hints that the token is seeing the formation of a bearish reversal indicator, as highlighted in the chart below.LINK/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingViewDubbed an “ascending broadening wedge,” the indicator showcases two rising bullish trendlines that deviate from one another. The pattern does not warrant buying exhaustion but points to sellers’ ambition to take over each time the price touches the upper trendline.As a result, LINK/USD still holds the potential of undergoing a large pullback toward the lower wedge trendline (around $28). Nonetheless, bears would need to close below $37.96, the 50% Fibonacci level of the Fibonacci retracement graph drawn from the $52.32 swing high and $13.61 swing low. The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Read More
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 95,463.58
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,313.82
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.998684
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.20
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 661.35
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 183.78
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.315373
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999602
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,307.90
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.898113
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.247884
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 36.83
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 22.84
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 5.45
wrapped-steth
Wrapped stETH (WSTETH) $ 3,935.82
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000022
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 95,442.57
sui
Sui (SUI) $ 4.31
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.358621
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 6.97
hedera-hashgraph
Hedera (HBAR) $ 0.266641
weth
WETH (WETH) $ 3,315.35
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid (HYPE) $ 26.22
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 444.61
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 9.36
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 14.01
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 102.65
pepe
Pepe (PEPE) $ 0.000018
wrapped-eeth
Wrapped eETH (WEETH) $ 3,503.25
near
NEAR Protocol (NEAR) $ 5.11
ethena-usde
Ethena USDe (USDE) $ 0.998470
bitget-token
Bitget Token (BGB) $ 4.11
usds
USDS (USDS) $ 0.999825
aptos
Aptos (APT) $ 9.25
aave
Aave (AAVE) $ 327.51
internet-computer
Internet Computer (ICP) $ 10.08
crypto-com-chain
Cronos (CRO) $ 0.155330
polygon-ecosystem-token
POL (ex-MATIC) (POL) $ 0.479766
mantle
Mantle (MNT) $ 1.18
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 26.37
vechain
VeChain (VET) $ 0.046221
render-token
Render (RENDER) $ 7.10
whitebit
WhiteBIT Coin (WBT) $ 24.52
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 190.83
mantra-dao
MANTRA (OM) $ 3.68
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 0.999878
bittensor
Bittensor (TAO) $ 458.82
fetch-ai
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) $ 1.27
arbitrum
Arbitrum (ARB) $ 0.758717
ethena
Ethena (ENA) $ 1.07